کاهش سوگیری‌های قضاوتی حسابرسان در هنگام ارزیابی انگیزه‌های رفتاری مثلث تقلب براساس استاندارد حسابرسی 240 ایران

پورحیدری، امید؛ بذرافشان، سعید. (1391). اثر ویژگی فردی حسابرسان در تعیین اهمیت بسترهای خطر تقلب. دانش حسابداری مالی، 3، 52-28.

کمیته تدوین استانداردهای حسابرسی. (1385). استانداردهای حسابرسی. تهران: سازمان حسابرسی. چاپ ششم.

کمیته تدوین استانداردهای حسابرسی. (1394). استانداردهای حسابرسی. تهران: سازمان حسابرسی. چاپ ششم.

مسیح‌آبادی، ابوالقاسم؛ سرپرچمی، محمد (1395) توانایی رویکردهای فازی در کشف تقلب در گزارشگری مالی و مقایسه کارایی آنها. دانش حسابداری، 31(4)، 161-190.

وحیدی الیزایی، ابراهیم؛ حدادیان، حامد. (1388). برداشت حسابرسان ایران از کارایی علایم خطر در کشف گزارشگری مالی متقلبانه. تحقیقات حسابداری، 3(1)، 197-164.

References

Albrecht, W.S., Conan, C.A., Chad, O.A. (2004). Fraud and corporate executives: Agency, stewardship and broken trust. Journal of Forensic Accounting 5(1), 109-130.

Auditing Organization Committee. (2006). Auditing standards. Tehran [In Persian].

Auditing Organization Committee. (2015). Auditing standards. tehran, Six edition [In Persian].

Bell, T.B., Carcello, J.V. (2000). A decision aid for assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(1), 169-184.

Boritz, J.E., Kozloski, N.K. (2015). Are fraud pecialists relatively more effective than auditors at modifying audit programs in the presence of fraud risk? The Accounting Review, 90(3), 881-915.

Daniel, S.J. (1988). Some empirical evidence about the assessment of audit risk in practice. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 7, 174-181.

Eining, M.M., Jones, D.R., Loebbecke, J.K. (1997). Reliance on decision aids: an examination of auditors' assessment of management fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice And Theory, 16, 1-19.

Gullkvist, B., Jokipii, A. (2013). Perceived importance of red flags across fraud types. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(1), 44-61.

Hammersley, J.S., Johnstone, M.K., Kadou, K. (2011). How do audit seniors respond to heightened fraud risk? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30, 81–101.

Heiman-Hoffman, V.B., Morgan, K.P., Patton, J.M. (1996). The warning signs of fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Accountancy October, 75-77.

Jiambalvo, J., Waller, W. (1984). Decomposition and assessments of audit risk. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 3, 80-88.

Jonas, G. (2001). Remarks given at the american accounting association national meeting. August 14, 2001. Atlanta, GA

Kinney Jr, Uecker, W.C. (1982). Mitigating the consequences of anchoring in auditor judgments. Accounting Review, 57(1), 55-69.‏

Knapp, C.A., Knapp, M.C. (2001). The effects of experience and explicit fraud risk assessment in detecting fraud with analytical procedures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 25-37.

Libby, R., Libby, P.A. (1989). Expert measurement and mechanical combination in control reliance decisions. The Accounting Review, 64, 729-747.

Loebbecke, J.K., Eining, M.M., Willingham, J.J. (1989). Auditors experience with material irregularities-frequency, nature, and detectability. Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(1), 1-28.

Massihabadi, A., Sarchami, M. (2017). Fuzzy approaches ability and their performance comparison to fraud detection in financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 8(4), 161-190 [In Persian].

Nisbett, R.E., Zukier, H., Lemley, R.E. (1981). The dilution effect: nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 248-277.

Norman, C.S., Rose, A.M., Rose, J.M. (2010). Internal audit reporting lines, fraud risk decomposition, and assessments of fraud risk. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 546-557.

Pourheydari, O., Bazrafshan, O. (2012). The effect of auditor's individual characteristics in nomination the importance of fraud risk substrates. A Quarterly Journal Of Empirical Reasearch Of Financial Accounting, 3, 28-52 [In Persian].

Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Rezaee, Z. (2005). Causes, consequences, and deterence of financial statement fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16, 277-298.

Simon, C., Smith, J.L., Zimbelman, M.F. (2018). The influence of judgment decomposition on auditors’ fraud risk assessments: Some tradeoffs. The Accounting Review, 93(5), 273-291.

Thorndike, E.L. (1920). Intelligence and Its Uses. Harper's Magazine.

Vahidi E., Hamedian, H. (2009). The belief of Iranian auditors from efficiency of signals to defect of frdiant financial reporting. Iranian ccounting research, 35, 1-35 [In Persian].

Webber, S.A., Sinason, D., Apostolou, B., Hassell, J.M. (2006). An investigation of auditor assessment of fraud risk. Journal of Forensic Accounting 7, 411-438.

Wild, J.J., Biggs, S.F. (1990). Strategic considerations for unaudited account values in analytical review. Accounting Review, 65(1), 227-241.

Wilks, T.J., Zimbelman, M.F. (2004). Decomposition of fraud risk assessments and auditors' sensitivity to fraud cues. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21, 719-745.

Wright, W.F. (2001). Task experience as a predictor of superior loan loss judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20, 147-155.

Ybarra, O., Stephan. W.G. (1999). Attributional orientations and the prediction of behavior: The attribution-prediction bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (5): 718-727.

Zimbelman, M.F. (1997). The effects of SAS No. 82 on auditors' attention to fraud risk factors and audit planning decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 35, 75-97.

Zimbelman, M.F., Waller, W.S. (1999). An experimental investigation of auditor-auditee interaction under ambiguity. Journal of Accounting Research, 37, 135-155.