آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 26 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 447 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,557 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,380,003 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,580,069 |
Unleashing Dairy Manure's Biogas Potential: A Michaelis-Menten Modeling Approach | ||
| Biomechanism and Bioenergy Research | ||
| دوره 3، شماره 1، شهریور 2024، صفحه 46-55 اصل مقاله (728.74 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Research | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22103/bbr.2024.22854.1076 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Javad Rezaeifar؛ Abbas Rohani* ؛ Mohammadali Ebrahimi-Nik | ||
| Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In the quest for improved anaerobic digestion (AD) efficiency and stability, iron-based additives and drinking water treatment sludge (DWTS) have emerged as promising components. This study explores the kinetics of methane production during AD of dairy manure under various concentrations of iron shavings (IS) and Fe3O4 (10, 20, and 30 mg/L) and DWTS (6, 12, and 18 mg/L). The experimental data were employed to assess the suitability of the Michaelis-Menten model as a non-linear regression (NLR) equation for evaluating the kinetics of dairy manure AD with these additives. The results demonstrate that the Michaelis-Menten model exhibits sufficient predictive capability for estimating cumulative methane production during the digestion process. The model was then utilized to compare the average cumulative methane production across the investigated treatments using the least significant difference (LSD) method, as well as to calculate the quantity of methane production at 25%, 50%, 75%, and 90% of the final methane yield. Notably, the findings revealed a significant difference (P > 0.05) in biomethane production among the different levels of DWTS, IS, and Fe3O4. Additionally, treatments containing varying levels of DWTS exhibited significantly shorter time durations to achieve 25% and 50% of their maximum methane yield compared to treatments containing Fe3O4. The most pronounced changes in these parameters were observed between distinct levels of IS. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Anaerobic digestion؛ Michaelis-Menten model؛ Dairy Manure؛ Iron-Based Additives | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Allen, E., Wall, D. M., Herrmann, C., Xia, A., & Murphy, J. D. (2015). What is the gross energy yield of third generation gaseous biofuel sourced from seaweed? Energy, 81, 352-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.048
Andriamanohiarisoamanana, F. J., Ihara, I., Yoshida, G., & Umetsu, K. (2020). Kinetic study of oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline inhibition in the anaerobic digestion of dairy manure. Bioresource Technology, 315(21), 123810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123810
Archontoulis, S. V., & Miguez, F. E. (2015). Nonlinear regression models and applications in agricultural research. Agronomy Journal, 107(2), 786-798. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0506
Cheng, J., Zhu, C., Zhu, J., Jing, X., Kong, F., & Zhang, C. (2020). Effects of waste rusted iron shavings on enhancing anaerobic digestion of food wastes and municipal sludge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118195
Choi, B., Rempala, G. A., & Kim, J. K. (2017). Beyond the Michaelis-Menten equation: Accurate and efficient estimation of enzyme kinetic parameters. Scientific reports, 7(1), 17018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17072-z
Choong, Y. Y., Norli, I., Abdullah, A. Z., & Yhaya, M. F. (2016). Impacts of trace element supplementation on the performance of anaerobic digestion process: A critical review. Bioresource Technology, 209, 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.028
Dioha, I. J., Ikeme, C. H., Nafi’u, T., Soba, N. I., & Yusuf, M. B. S. (2013). Effect of carbon to nitrogen ratio on biogas production. International Research Journal of Natural Sciences, 1(3), 1-10.
Ebrahimi-Nik, M., Heidari, A., Azghandi, S. R., Mohammadi, F. A., & Younesi, H. (2018). Drinking water treatment sludge as an effective additive for biogas production from food waste; kinetic evaluation and biomethane potential test. Bioresource Technology, 260, 421-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.112
Hassaan, M. A., El Nemr, A., Elkatory, M. R., Eleryan, A., Ragab, S., El Sikaily, A., & Pantaleo, A. (2021). Enhancement of biogas production from macroalgae ulva latuca via ozonation pretreatment. Energies, 14(6), 1703. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061703
Holliger, C., Alves, M., Andrade, D., Angelidaki, I., Astals, S., Baier, U., . . . De Wilde, V. (2016). Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests. Water Science and Technology, 74(11), 2515-2522. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.336
Huiliñir, C., Montalvo, S., & Guerrero, L. (2015). Biodegradability and methane production from secondary paper and pulp sludge: effect of fly ash and modeling. Water Science and Technology, 72(2), 230-237. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.210
Huiliñir, C., Pinto-Villegas, P., Castillo, A., Montalvo, S., & Guerrero, L. (2017). Biochemical methane potential from sewage sludge: Effect of an aerobic pretreatment and fly ash addition as source of trace elements. Waste Management, 64, 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.023
Karki, R., Chuenchart, W., Surendra, K., Sung, S., Raskin, L., & Khanal, S. K. (2022). Anaerobic co-digestion of various organic wastes: Kinetic modeling and synergistic impact evaluation. Bioresource Technology, 343, 126063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126063
Khademi, S., & Masomi, A. (2022). Production of Biogas from Dairy Manure and Frying Oil in a Continuous Flow Digestion Equipped with an Automatic Control System. Biomechanism and Bioenergy Research, 1(2), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.22103/BBR.2022.20451.1021
Khamis, A. (2005). Nonlinear growth models for modeling oil palm yield growth. J. of mathematics and statistics, 1(3), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2005.225.233
Li, W., Khalid, H., Zhu, Z., Zhang, R., Liu, G., Chen, C., & Thorin, E. (2018). Methane production through anaerobic digestion: Participation and digestion characteristics of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Applied Energy, 226, 1219-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.055
Naik, S. N., Goud, V. V., Rout, P. K., & Dalai, A. K. (2010). Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 14(2), 578-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003
Pramanik, S. K., Suja, F. B., Porhemmat, M., & Pramanik, B. K. (2019). Performance and kinetic model of a single-stage anaerobic digestion system operated at different successive operating stages for the treatment of food waste. Processes, 7(9), 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7090600
Raposo Bejines, F., Rubia, M., Fernández-Cegrí, V., & Borja Padilla, R. (2012). Anaerobic digestion of solid organic substrates in batch mode: An overview relating to methane yields and experimental procedures. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 16(1), 861-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.008
Rezaeifar, J., Rohani, A., & Ebrahimi-Nik, M. (2023). Investigating the Efficiency of Drinking Water Treatment Sludge and Iron-Based Additives in Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure: A Kinetic Modeling Study. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 14(1), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2023.83173.1176
Srivastava, N., Rawat, R., Singh Oberoi, H., & Ramteke, P. W. (2015). A review on fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass. International Journal of Green Energy, 12(9), 949-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2014.890104
Tabassum, M. R., Xia, A., & Murphy, J. D. (2018). Biomethane production from various segments of brown seaweed. Energy conversion and management, 174, 855-862. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 109 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 132 |
||