Statistics
| Number of Journals | 26 |
| Number of Issues | 454 |
| Number of Articles | 4,662 |
| Article View | 5,529,688 |
| PDF Download | 3,681,829 |
Clint Firms’ Rejection by Auditors: The Effect of Client Firms’ Financial Position and Auditors’ and Client Firms’ Reputation | ||
| مجله دانش حسابداری | ||
| Article 2, Volume 14, Issue 3 - Serial Number 54, December 2023, Pages 21-38 PDF (848.67 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22103/jak.2022.19903.3747 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Fakhroddin MohammadRezaei1; Mona Parsaei2; omid faraji* 3; ُShiva Mosallanejad4; Seyed Mohammad Alavi Nasab5 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor of Accounting, Faculty of Finance, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant Professor of Accounting, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran. | ||
| 4Ph.D. of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran. | ||
| 5Assistant Professor of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Objective: Intense competition among audit firms will likely encourage auditors to find new clients. An audit firm tries to reach a good reputation in the society. Higher reputation audit firms provide better audit quality service to their clients to protect their reputation in society. They do not tend to audit a firm known for management abuses or providing misleading financial reports. Besides, an incorrect acceptance decision by the audit firm can lead to legal claims and impose excessive costs on the auditor, as well as the loss of reputation of the auditor and public trust in the profession and financial reporting of companies. Paying attention to the good reputation of auditors and the client firms and clients’ financial position is likely to be an effective factor in the auditors' acceptance or rejection decision. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of client firms’ financial position, auditors’ and client firms’ reputation on the rejection decision of client firms by auditors. Method: The sample of this research contains 109 participants, including Iranian audit partners, managers and senior audit supervisors. In order to test the hypotheses, a quasi-experimental method is used. This study has a 2x2x2 mixed design. Two independent variables, including “reputation” and “financial position” of the client firm, are between-subjects variables, and the third independent variable is “auditors’ reputation”, a within-subjects variable. All the participants in the experiment were divided into four groups. Subjects in these groups receive different levels for the financial position of the client firm and auditors’ and client firms’ reputations (profitable and unprofitable, reputable and disreputable) and provide us with their acceptance or rejection decision. In each scenario, the audit firm is asked to suppose that it would be considered for the role of a large auditor with a high reputation or a small auditor with a low reputation. Each participant assesses his tendency to accept the client's firm. Hypotheses are examined using multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The results show that auditors’ and client firms’ reputations and the client firms’ financial position significantly affect the auditor's acceptance decision. In addition, changes in the reputation of client firms do not affect the willingness of auditors with higher reputations to accept that client. As the client firms' financial position improves, more reputable auditors' willingness to accept clients’ offers increases. Conclusion: To manage the reputation risk, large audit firms should prevent accepting client firms with a high risk. Besides, more reputable auditors usually have large client firms, making them considerable income. Therefore, they might more easily reject client firms who are not qualified for them. Also, audit firms with a higher reputation are usually under the supervision of the government, shareholders and the public, making them more cautious in accepting new clients and avoiding clients who damage their reputation. In addition, the client firm's reputation is considered a factor affecting the auditor's acceptance decision. Auditors would not accept notorious clients as they know this would lead to reputational damage and threaten their independence. Due to the effect of the client’s financial position and profitability on the auditor's decision, we conclude that auditors perceive that a firm in financial distress or goes bankrupt may not be able to pay the auditors' fees and provide them with the necessary facilities, and for this reason, they refuse to accept it. Therefore, one of the factors considered in the acceptance decision would be the audit fee, which can be realized from the last annual financial statements. If the client does not have the ability to pay the fee, the audit firm should reject that client. This study makes the following contributions. First, despite doing research at the international level about the factors affecting the rejection decision of client firms, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that examines the factors separately and interactively in an experimental design. Second, This research provides interesting evidence about the impacts of the client firms’ and auditor’s reputation, which may not be easily measured in archival research. Therefore, the findings of this study contribute to auditors’ Judgment and decision-making (JDM) quality literature. In order to reduce the risk of legal claims, it is recommended that audit firms pay attention to the point that the financial information and the reputation of the client firm are closely related, and they should consider factors such as the company's disclosure quality, financial position and performance, cash flows, and corporate governance characteristics. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Non-Acceptance of the Client; Reputation of the Auditor; Financial Position of the Client; Reputation of the Client | ||
| References | ||
|
احمدزاده، زاهد؛ یعقوبنژاد، احمد و وکیلیفرد، حمیدرضا (1400). تأثیر تعهد نسبت به منافععموم و الزام به استقلال بر ارزشهای حرفهای (ارزشهایاخلاقی) در مؤسسات حسابرسی. مجله دانش حسابداری، 12(2)، 138-123 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_2889_9db2e94594e85a73ac6b2b2b6d 8834fa.pdf.
حساس یگانه، یحیی (1392). فلسفه حسابرسی. تهران، انتشارات علمی فرهنگی.
حساس یگانه، یحیی؛ عرب احمدی، علی اصغر (1386). عوامل مؤثر بر تصمیم پذیرش صاحبکار در مؤسسات حسابرسی. فصلنامه مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 5(19)، 114-93 https://qjma.atu.ac.ir/article_4246_aa476f1c6126fe13a038a0e7df2ebdf1.pdf.
خدامیپور، احمد؛ علیپور سرمست، کاظم (1392). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش یا رد صاحبکار جدید از دیدگاه حسابرسان مستقل. فصلنامه پژوهش حسابداری، 3(9)، 19-1 https://journal.alzahra.ac.ir/article_458_89404d471305560d8825d588033ca096.pdf.
داناییفرد، حسن؛ الوانی، سید مهدی؛ آذر، عادل (1396). روش شناسی پژوهشهای کمی در مدیریت: رویکردی جامع، انتشارات صفار، تهران.
صفیخانی، رضا؛ صفرزاده، محمدحسین و اثنی عشری، حمیده (1401). بررسی رابطه تردید حرفهای، شناخت صاحبکار و قضاوت حسابرس. مجله دانش حسابداری، 13(1)، 82-59 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_3013_e7a93a57dbe25fb0586e0fae6a841e2d.pdf.
عرباحمدی، علی اصغر. (1385). عوامل مؤثر بر تصمیم پذیرش صاحبکار در مؤسسات حسابرسی، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی تهران.
قدیمپور، جواد و دستگیر، محسن (1395). بررسی تأثیر عوامل ریسک دادخواهی حسابرسان بر حقالزحمه حسابرسی. فصلنامه پژوهشهای حسابداری مالی، 8(30)، 54-37 https://far.ui.ac.ir/article_21426_bdc7eb83da50e238cc6f225262c12a74.pdf.
محمدرضایی، فخرالدین؛ فرجی، امید؛ علوینسب، سیدمحمد و مصلینژاد، شیوا (1400). عوامل مؤثر بر عدم پذیرش صاحبکار توسط مؤسسات حسابرسی. فصلنامه پژوهشهای تجربی حسابداری، 12(42)، 168-151 https://journal.alzahra.ac.ir/article_5878_7e62c7ca4e8e31ab56cf84 c47a5dd848.pdf.
مرادی، محمد؛ یحیایی، منیره و اسکندر، هدی (1400). تدوین الگوی پذیرش صاحبکار در مؤسسات حسابرسی. مجله دانش حسابرسی، 21(83)، 226-195 https://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-2315-fa.html.
References
Adams, T., Krishnan, J., & Krishnan, J.(2017). Client influence and auditor independence revisited: Evidence from auditor resignations. University of Connecticut School of Business Research Paper, 17 (5), 1-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106846.
Ahmadzadeh, Z., Yaghoobnezhad, A., & Vakilifard, H. (2021). The effect of auditors’ commitment to public interests and independence enforcement on professional values (ethical values) in audit firms. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 12(2), 123-138 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_2889_9db2e94594e85a73ac6b2b2b6d 8834fa.pdf [In Persian].
Arunanda, B.(2004). Audit failure and the crises of auditing. European Business Organization Law Review, 3(5), 634-643 DOI:10.1017/S1566752904006354.
Decker, J., Ray, R., & Kizirian, T. (2016). The auditor’s road map for client acceptance. Journal of Business Case Studies, 12(3), 99-102 https://doi.org/10.19030/jbcs.v12i3.9710.
DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2), 275-326 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
Ghadimpoor, J., & Dastghir, M. (2016). Investigating the effects of litigation risk factors on audit fee. Financial Accounting Research, 8(4), 37-54 https://far.ui.ac.ir/article_21426_bdc7eb83da50e238cc6f225262c12a74 .pdf [In Persian].
Hassas Yeganeh, Y., & Arab Ahmadi, A. A. (2007). Effective factors in client acceptance decision in audit firms. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 5(19), 93-114 https://qjma.atu.ac.ir/article_4246_aa476f1c 6126fe13a038a0e7df2ebdf1.pdf [In Persian].
Huang, T.C., Chang, H., & Chiou, J.R.(2016). Audit market concentration, audit fee, and audit quality: Evidence from China. Auditing, A Journal of Practice and Theory, 35(2), 121- 145.
IFAC.(2010). Client acceptance and continuance.
Johnson, A., & Snyder, R. C.(2017). Acceptance or rejection of an audit client: Understanding risk in the auditing environment. Journal of Business Case Studies, 13(2), 42-67 https://doi.org/10.19030/jbcs.v13i2.9928.
Joshi, P.L., Al Ajmi, J., & Bremser, W.G.(2009). A study of auditor client relationships and problems in the Bahraini audit environment, Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 25(2), 266-277 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2009.08.003.
Khoddamipour, A., & Alipoursarmast, K. (2013). Examining the factors affecting the acceptance or rejection of a new employer from the point of view of independent auditors. Journal of Accounting Research, 3(9): 19-1 https://journal.alzahra.ac.ir/article_458_89404d471305560d8825d588033ca096.pdf [In Persian].
Khoo, E.S., Lim, Y., & Monroe, G.S. (2020). Corporate reputation and the timeliness of external audit and earnings announcement. International Journal of Auditing, 24(3), 366-395 https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12202.
Krishnan, J., & Krishnan, J. (1997). Litigation risk and auditor resignations. The Accounting Review, 72(4), 539-560 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00019-7.
Mayers, A. (2013). Introduction to statistics and SPSS in psychology. Pearson Education.
Mohammadrezaei, F., Moh-Saleh, N., & Ahmed, K.(2018). Audit firm ranking, audit quality and audit fees: Examining conflicting price discrimination views. The International Journal of Accounting, 53(4), 295-313 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2018.11.003.
Mohammad Rezaei, F., Faraji, O., Alavi Nasab, M., & Mosallanejad, Sh. (2021). Effective factors on client non-acceptance decision by auditing firms. Journal Of Empirical Research In Accounting, 11(42), 151-168 SID. https://journal.alzahra.ac.ir/article_5878_7e62c7ca4e8e31ab56cf84c47a5dd848.pdf [In Persian].
Moradi, M., Yahyayi, M., & Eskandar, H. (2021). Compilation of the model for accepting employers in audit institutions. Journal of Auditing Knowledge, 21(83), 195-226 https://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-2315-fa.html [In Persian].
Pierre, K., & J.A. Anderson. (1984). An analysis of the factors associated with lawsuits against public accountants. The Accounting Review, 59(2), 242-263 https://www.jstor.org/stable/247297.
Rindova, V.P., Williamson, I.O., Petkova, A.P., & Sever, J.M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1033-1049 https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159728.
Safikhani, R., Safarzadeh, M.H., & Asna Ashari, H. (2022). A Review of Releaton between Professional Skepticism, Client-Specific Experiences, and Audit Judgments. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 13(1), 59-82 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_3013_e7a93a57dbe25fb0586e0fae6a841e2d.pdf [In Persian].
Sengupta, P., Shen, M., (2007). Can accruals quality explain auditor's decision making? The impact of accruals Quality on audit fees, going concern opinions and auditor change. Working Paper, George Mason University.
Stice, J.D. (1991). Using financial and market information to identify preengagement factors associated with lawsuits against auditors. The Accounting Review, 66, 516-533 https://www.jstor.org/stable/247807.
Venkataraman, R., Weber, J., & Willenborg, M. (2008). Litigation risk, audit quality, and audit fees: Evidence from initial public offerings. The Accounting Review, 83, 315–1345 https://www.jstor.org/stable/30243547.
Walo, J.C. (1995). The effects of auditor's business risk on audit scope. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 14(1), 115-124 https://www.jstor.org/stable/248489.
Willert, R. (2021). Client Acceptance: Procedures and Auditor Considerations for Approval, On November 2, 2021, https://linfordco.com. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 840 PDF Download: 291 |
||